約 3,882,795 件
https://w.atwiki.jp/kbhyakka/pages/667.html
Patti Smith Horses
https://w.atwiki.jp/kamekichi/pages/70.html
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 【キャラ名】+Katorea.Smith+ 【職業】KNIGHT 【LV】BASE97/JOB50 【型】VIT特化両手剣騎士 【ステータス】STR 86+10 AGI 19+4 VIT 90+10 INT 1 DEX 44+6 LUK 1+4 ?cmd=upload act=open pageid=23 file=%E9%A8%8E%E5%A3%AB.JPG ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 【キャラ名】Katorea.Smith 【職業】WIZARD 【LV】BASE84/JOB50 【型】INT=DEX氷雷系 【ステータス】STR 1 AGI 9+4 VIT 1 INT 85+11 DEX 81+16 LUK 1 ?cmd=upload act=open pageid=23 file=WIZ.JPG ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 【キャラ名】カトレア・スミス 【職業】BLACKSMITH 【LV】BASE70/JOB41 【型】DEX LUK製造系(両手剣/鈍器のみ) 【ステータス】STR 39 AGI 12 VIT 1 INT 1 DEX 74+16 LUK 45+8 ?cmd=upload act=open pageid=23 file=BS.JPG ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 【キャラ名】.Katorea.Smith. 【職業】DANCER 【LV】BASE63/JOB35 【型】VIT DEXロキダンサー 【ステータス】STR 1 AGI 1+3 VIT 73+1 INT 9+4 DEX 51+21 LUK 9 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
https://w.atwiki.jp/sp12ex-hard/pages/35.html
GENRE TITLE ARTIST bpm notes エクハ難度 TRANSCENDENTAL ETUDES Thor s Hammer ユニバーサル度胸兄弟 150 1641 10 曲・譜面情報 既存難易度投票 IIDX ID書き込みは必須です。 ID書き込みがない場合、反映しないことがあります。 ご了承ください。 既存難易度投票はツリーのどこでも構いません。コメントの先頭に、詐称(+1.1とカウント),強(+0.6とカウント),やや強(+0.3とカウント),中(±0とカウント),やや弱(-0.3とカウント),弱(-0.6とカウント),逆詐称(-1.1とカウント)を明記した上、半角スペース1つの後、理由を記載してください。(理由は必須ではありませんが、なるべく入力してください。) コメントミスの際は、その下へコメント欄に「コメントミスです。」とご記載ください。 難易度変更が決定した際、管理者がそのツリーに難易度変更したことを記載します。 その際、新たな難易度変更提案は親コメントへお願いします。 管理者の難易度変更コメントより後ろの同じツリー内の投票は無視されます。 ご了承ください。 詳しいことは、投票時のルールをご覧ください。 強 エクハだと大階段後にBADハマリするだけで即死する為非常にシビア - 5297-2124 2017-02-27 01 45 40 詐称 ディアボロに比べて餡蜜もし辛く、癖や個人差が出やすくランダムで埋まる場合が多いがランダムだと完全に詐称 - 4652-5223 2017-03-19 23 58 58 詐称 - 名無しさん 2017-03-20 01 24 34 強 発狂が長く、他度胸譜面と比べても対策がしづらい。個人的には詐称にも思うが、自分でもトールが群を抜いて下手だと思うので強で。 - 9605-2744 2017-03-20 02 27 18 IIDX ID 攻略情報・コメント ID書き込みは任意です。 IIDX ID コメント すべてのコメントを見る
https://w.atwiki.jp/mtgflavortext/pages/1101.html
槌によって鋳られ、槌によって失われる。 By hammer forged, and by hammer undone. ワールドウェイク 【M TG Wiki】 名前
https://w.atwiki.jp/i_ro/pages/143.html
For a pre-Renewal version of this article, click here. Job Base(s) Merchant Job Type 2-1 Changes At Einbroch× Number of Skills 21 Total Skill Points 84 Total Quest Skills 2 Job Bonuses STR AGI VIT INT DEX LUK +6 +2 +6 +2 +12 +2 +← クリックで目次を開く Overview Job Change Guide BuildsBattlesmithBattlesmith Stat Build Pure Forger Battle ForgerBasic Battle Forger Build (lv99) EquipmentBattlesmithWeaponPvP WoE MVP PvM PvP, WoE, MVP PvM Shield HeadgearUpper Headgear Middle and Lower Headgear Footgear Armor Garment Accessory Class DataSkillsBattle Skills Forging Skills Quest Skills Soul Link Job Bonuses ASPD External Links Overview Blacksmiths have the ability to forge weapons. They can master the power to imbue weapons with elements of Fire, Earth, Wind and Water and also have the ability to increase the weapon damage further. Of course, Blacksmiths can also be based off raw physical power, and even have the highest melee damage among the other 2nd classes. A Battle Blacksmith s main skills revolve around the theme of self-buffing to increase damage. The main offensive skills are Mammonite× and Cart Revolution×, which both can be learned as a Merchant. Job Change Guide See Blacksmith Job Change Guide for detailed information. Changing into a Blacksmith from a Merchant requires the player to complete a number of tasks Item Collection Written Test After completing these tests, the player will be transformed into a Blacksmith. This mostly takes place in Einbroch×. Builds There are three common Blacksmith stat builds Battlesmith, Pure Forger and Battle Forger. Battlesmith A Battlesmith usually obtains all of the combat skills and no forging or refining skills. Superfluous smith skill points are spent towards maxing Merchant skills like Enlarge Weight Limit×. The exception is level 1 Iron Tempering× and Steel Tempering×, which is needed for Ore Discovery×. Battlesmiths vary in stat builds, but most invest heavily in STR. Battlesmith Stat Build STR× 90-120 AGI× 50-70 VIT× 50-70 INT× 1-20 DEX× 50-60 LUK× 1-30 Pure Forger A Pure Forger masters the art of forging× weapons and therefore lacks skills in the combat department. It is not wise to make a Pure Forger as a first character, since leveling one is difficult. Soloing and partying Difficult due to the lack of offensive and defensive skills. Leveling with a tank Possible at lower levels, but quickly becomes ineffective after becoming a Blacksmith. Leeching from an even share party The preferred way, and probably the fastest way of leveling a Pure Forger. Leeching from a mercenary The most effective way to do it solo. As a Pure Forger, the main stats are very simple DEX and LUK. They equally increases the chance to successfully forge weapons. The ideal forging stat build has 99 DEX and 99 LUK, leaving only 9 points in either STR or INT. Since stat points are vastly more expensive at higher levels, and since 99 DEX and LUK make levelling difficult, some players choose not become entirely Pure Forge. This is the route of Battle Forgers. For every 1 point of DEX you have, adds 0.1 to your forging sucess rate. For every 1 point of LUK you have, adds 0.1 to your forging sucess rate. Every job level adds 0.2 to your forging sucess rate. Battle Forger Using high DEX among other stats, the Battle Forger works well with level 3 and 4 weapons without sacrificing a great deal of forging chances (though a Battle Forger may also want to include LUK for forge support and crit chance.) Combining weapon forging with weapon buffing skills makes the "Battle Forger" a respectable main or first character; able to obtain profit and function in a party. In spite of the perks and dualities, the Battle Forger is often seen as an "inferior" build to it s siblings. While it is true that Battlesmith is more effective at buffing weapon based jobs, and Pure Forger will generate more profits; the margin of difference becomes smaller as the build becomes more geared to a single extreme. It is not advisable to use a Battle Forger if your intentions in making a Blacksmith are purely for profit or weapon buffing. Battle Forgers also have a dilemma of having to choose between the weapon types to forge and the buffs to use, so it is advised that a Battle Forger pays attention to their server s most profitable weapon, or what they may need for other characters. Basic Battle Forger Build (lv99) STR 74+6 (73+7 with Hilt Binding×) AGI 50+2 DEX 88+12 INT 16+2 VIT 25+6 LUK 33+2 Leftover of 1 stat point Equipment -冗長過ぎる Battlesmith Weapon Skills and Items (such as Adrenaline Rush× or Berserk Potion ) is a must-have for ASPD×. PvP WoE Valorous Insane Battle Axe Brave Insane Battle Axe Valorous Battlefield Morning Star Brave Battlefield Morning Star MVP PvM Orcish Axe [4] Battle Axe [4] Mace [4] Two-handed Axe [2] compounded with any Race, Size, Element or +ATK× cards PvP, WoE, MVP PvM Ice pick Ice Pick [1] Advanced Adrenaline Rush is needed for a higher ASPD for weapons other than an Axe× or a Mace×. Zipper Bear Card is usually compounded on the slotted Ice Pick. Shield Buckler [1] Stone Buckler [1] Valkyrja s Shield [1] compounded with any Race Reduction card Headgear Upper Headgear Orc Helm [1] Bone Helm [1] Majestic Goat Majestic Goat [1] Magni s Cap Deviruchi Card Vanberk Card Cramp Card (adds STR +3 when equipped with a Tarou Card ) Middle and Lower Headgear Angel Wing Ears Evil Wing Ears Sigrun s Wings Robo Eye Welding Mask Alarm Mask Opera Masque Pirate Dagger Evolved Pipe Spare Card Footgear Boots [1] Battle Greave [1] Shackles Combined with Bloodied Shackle Ball Matyr Card Green Ferus Card Firelock Soldier Card adds Max HP× and Max SP× +10% when the footgear is upgraded to +9 or higher. Armor Chain Mail [1] Elite Engineer Armor [1] Odin s Blessing [1] Pecopeco Card Marc Card Garment Manteau [1] Pauldron [1] Captain s Manteau [1] compounded with any card that boosts Race, Size, Element Reduction, or Flee×. Accessory Ring [1] + Mantis Card Ring [1] + Tarou Card (Cramp Card bonus) Bloodied Shackle Ball Medal of Honor Class Data Skills See Merchant Skills for first class skills. Battle Skills Skill Description Levels Type Adrenaline Rush× For 30~150 seconds, increase Attack Speed of party members equipped with Axe and Mace class weapons (30% for Blacksmiths, 25% for other classes). 5 Active Hammer Fall× 30~70% Chance of stun×ning all enemies within a 5x5 area. 5 Active Hilt Binding× STR +1, ATK +4. Increases the durations of Adrenaline Rush×, Power-Thrust× and Weapon Perfection× Skills by 10%. 1 Passive Power Maximize× Uses maximum weapon damage for skill duration. 5 Active Power-Thrust× (20~100 seconds.) You have +5~25% ATK. Other party members have +5% ATK. Affected players have 0.1% chance of breaking their own non-axe, non-mace class weapons when attacking. 5 Supportive Skin Tempering× You have +4~20% Fire resistance and +1~5% Neutral resistance. 5 Passive Weapon Perfection× For 10~50 seconds, party members have no weapon size penalties. 5 Active Forging Skills Skill Description Levels Type Enchantedstone Craft× Enables the creation of Elemental Stones. 5 Passive Iron Tempering× Enables the creation of Iron from Iron Ore . 5 Passive Ore Discovery× Adds low chance of finding certain ores when killing monsters. 1 Passive Oridecon Research× Increases the chance of crafting Level 3 Weapons. 5 Passive Smith Axe× Enables the creation of various Axe class weapons. 3 Passive Smith Dagger× Enables the creation of various Dagger× class weapons. 3 Passive Smith Knucklebrace× Enables the creation of various Knuckle× class weapons. 3 Passive Smith Mace× Enables the creation of various Mace class weapons. 3 Passive Smith Spear× Enables the creation of various Spear× class weapons. 3 Passive Smith Sword× Enables the creation of various One Handed Sword× class weapons. 3 Passive Smith Two-handed Sword× Enables the creation of various Two Handed Sword× class weapons. 3 Passive Steel Tempering× Enables the creation of Steel from Iron and Coal . 5 Passive Weapon Repair× Returns damaged equipment to usable state. 1 Active Weaponry Research× Increases HIT×, ATK of the chance of Forging a weapon. 10 Passive Quest Skills Skill Description Levels Type Job Level Requirement Quest Greed× Automatically pick up items in a 5x5 area around caster. 1 Active N/A Greed Quest Dubious Salesmanship× Reduces the Zeny× cost of the skill Mammonite. 1 Passive 35 Dubious Salesmanship Quest Soul Link The Blacksmith Spirit× enables the use of Skill Description Levels Type Advanced Adrenaline Rush× Reduces attack delay of all party members using melee weapons. 1 Active Job Bonuses The Levels in which you receive a certain bonus. Stat\Amount +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7 +8 +9 +10 +11 +12 STR 3 8 16 23 31 44 AGI 29 38 VIT 7 13 20 32 37 49 INT 21 34 DEX 1 4 5 9 12 19 26 28 36 39 40 47 LUK 11 46 ASPD This article or section is in need of attention from an expert on the subject.Please help recruit one or improve this article yourself. See the talk page for details. External Links Skill Simulator Forge Calculator Refining Calculator -Blacksmith ・ Mastersmith ・ Mechanic Blacksmith ・ Mastersmith ・ Mechanic 2nd ClassSkills Adrenaline Rush× ・ Advanced Adrenaline Rush× ・ Dubious Salesmanship× ・ Enchantedstone Craft× ・ Greed× ・ Hammer Fall× ・ Hilt Binding× ・ Iron Tempering× ・ Ore Discovery× ・ Oridecon Research× ・ Power Maximize× ・ Power-Thrust× ・ Skin Tempering× ・ Smith Axe× ・ Smith Dagger× ・ Smith Knucklebrace× ・ Smith Mace× ・ Smith Spear× ・ Smith Sword× ・ Smith Two-handed Sword× ・ Steel Tempering× ・ Weapon Perfection× ・ Weapon Repair× ・ Weaponry Research× TranscendentSkills Battle Machine Craft× ・ Cart Boost× ・ Coin Craft× ・ High Speed Cart Ram× ・ Maximum Power-Thrust× ・ Nugget Craft× ・ Shattering Strike× ・ Upgrade Weapon× 3rd ClassSkills Acceleration× ・ Analyze× ・ Arm Cannon× ・ Axe Boomerang× ・ Axe Mastery× ・ Axe Tornado× ・ Back Slide× ・ Cooldown× ・ Divest FAW× ・ Elemental Shift× ・ FAW Magic Decoy× ・ FAW Silver Sniper× ・ Fire Earth Research× ・ Flame Launcher× ・ Front Slide× ・ Hover× ・ Ice Launcher× ・ Infrared Scan× ・ Knuckle Boost× ・ Madogear License× ・ Magnetic Field× ・ Neutral Barrier× ・ Pile Bunker× ・ Power Swing× ・ Remodel Mainframe× ・ Repair× ・ Stealth Field× ・ Suicidal Destruction× ・ Vulcan Arm× Quests Blacksmith Job Change Guide ・ Blacksmith Skill Quest ・ Rebirth Walkthrough ・ Mechanic Job Change Guide Weapons× Axe× ・ Mace× -Classes of Ragnarok Online Classes of Ragnarok Online Novice Class Novice ・ High Novice ・ Super Novice First Class / High First Class Acolyte ・ Archer ・ Mage ・ Merchant ・ Swordman ・ Thief Second Class Priest ・ Monk ・ Hunter ・ Bard ・ Dancer ・ Wizard ・ Sage ・ Blacksmith ・ Alchemist ・ Knight ・ Crusader ・ Assassin ・ Rogue Transcendent Second Class High Priest ・ Champion ・ Sniper ・ Minstrel ・ Gypsy ・ High Wizard ・ Scholar ・ Mastersmith ・ Biochemist ・ Lord Knight ・ Paladin ・ Assassin Cross ・ Stalker Third Class Arch Bishop ・ Sura ・ Ranger ・ Maestro ・ Wanderer ・ Warlock ・ Sorcerer ・ Mechanic ・ Geneticist ・ Rune Knight ・ Royal Guard ・ Guillotine Cross ・ Shadow Chaser Expanded Class Gunslinger ・ Ninja ・ TaeKwon Kid Expanded Second Class TaeKwon Master ・ Soul Linker ・ Kagerou ・ Oboro ・ Rebel× Doram Summoner Crafting Articles NPC Enhancement Refinement System · Socket Enchant · Hidden Enchant Blacksmith/Mastersmith-Related Forging (Oridecon Research · Smith Axe · Smith Dagger · Smith Knucklebrace · Smith Mace · Smith Spear · Smith Sword · Smith Two-handed Sword · Weaponry Research) · Refining (Enchantedstone Craft · Iron Tempering · Steel Tempering) · Weapon Materials · Upgrade Weapon Alchemist/Biochemist-Related Potion Creation · Fame System Categories Blacksmith | Classes | Merchant | Pages needing expert attention
https://w.atwiki.jp/blrjpwiki/pages/195.html
タイプ スキル クラス 近接 ダメージ 175 効果 即時 範囲 2.6m 概要 Breach Hammerから威力を下げただけ…ではない近接武器。もちろん誘導つき。 基本的な部分はBreach Hammerと一緒ではあるが、この武器は衝突の際に時間式の毒弾頭を設置する機能を持つ。 設置場所は敵味方あるいは壁などを問わずどこにでもできる。例外として動いているHSには設置できないようだ。 ひとたび毒弾頭が設置されると5秒たったあとに、Toxic Grenade Mk.1のような毒霧を散布する。 敵の頭に毒グレネードを叩きつけるという人道もクソもない代物である。 敵を殴った際には基本ダメージの175を相手に与え、死亡していようが生きていようが相手を中心とした毒の爆発が発生する。 仮に生き延びたとして、体力を回復しようとデポ、もしくはHeal Injector Mk.1を持った仲間に近寄るといった方向に走るだろう。…あとの惨事は想像するに容易い。そんな使い方ができる近接ギアである。 あるいは単純に突入してきそうなところに仕掛けておくだけでも威力を発揮できるだろう。 Breach Hammerと同じく、殴ってからリロードが可能になるまで1秒、リロードに1秒程度を要する。 また弾頭は爆発物判定を持っているので近くの地雷などを誘爆する。 Practiceを使った検証では20発以上の弾頭が連続で設置できることを確認した。ここから弾数制限はない、あるいは実質ないものだと思っていいだろう。 ちなみにHSを殴った場合には80%軽減を受けずに100%ダメージを与えることができるようだ。 コメント欄 名前
https://w.atwiki.jp/bemani2dp/pages/5023.html
GENRE TITLE ARTIST bpm notes DUBSTEP GLORIOUS HAMMER AJURIKA 155-160 1040 攻略・コメント 名前 コメント
https://w.atwiki.jp/ava_pokemon/pages/58.html
HAMMER BLOW
https://w.atwiki.jp/kumicit/pages/773.html
Kumicitのコンテンツ 反進化論州法動向 反進化論州法資料 Smith v. State裁判(1970) 1926年のミシシッピ州反進化論州法を違憲として無効だとしたミシシッピ州最高裁判決(1970/12/211)。これにより、進化論教育を禁じる州法はすべて無効となった。 この判決では、進化論教育を禁じるアーカンソー州法を違憲とした1968年のEpperson v. Arkansas裁判にしたがって... In determining this question we are constrained to follow the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States wherein that Court has construed similar statutes involving the First Amendment to the Constituton of the United States. In the recent case of Epperson v. Arkansas, 393 U.S. 97, 89 S.Ct. 266, 21 L.Ed.2d 228 (1968), the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Arkansas statutes forbidding the teaching of evolution in public schools and colleges and universities supported in whole or part by public funds were contrary to the freedom of religion mandate of the First Amendment and in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. この問題を判断するにあたり、我々は、裁判所は、米国憲法修正第1条を含む同様の法令を解釈した米国最高裁判所の判決に従うよう制約されている。最近のEpperson v. Arkansas裁判(393 U.S. 97, 89 S.Ct. 266, 21 L.Ed.2d 228) (1968)で、米国最高裁判所は、公的資金によって全体または一部をサポートされている公立学校や大学での進化論教育を禁じるアーカンソー州法は、憲法修正第1条の宗教の自由に反しており、修正第14条に違反である。 ミシシッピ州反進化論州法を違憲であり、無効であると判断している。 We also hold that Section 6798 and 6799 are in contravention to the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and are, therefore, void and of no effect. また、セクション6798と6799は、米国憲法修正第1条に違反している、したがって、無効であり、効力を持たないと判断する。 Smith v. State裁判判決 [ Smith v. State, 242 So. 2d 692 - Miss Supreme Court 1970 ] 242 So.2d 692 (1970) Mrs. Arthur G. SMITH v. STATE of Mississippi and State Board of Education of the State of Mississippi. No. 46058. Supreme Court of Mississippi. December 21, 1970. Burgin, Gholson, Hicks Nichols, Columbus, for appellant. A.F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Maurice R. Black, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellees. INZER, Justice This case involves two questions. The first is whether the amended bill of complaint filed by appellant in the Chancery Court of the First Judicial District of Hinds County states a cause of action and raises a justiciable issue. The second is whether Sections 6798 and 6799, Mississippi Code 1942 Annotated (1952), commonly referred to as anti-evolution statutes, are in contravention to the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. We hold that the amended bill of complaint does state a cause of action and that Sections 6798 and 6799 are in contravention of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and are, therefore, unconstitutional. Mrs. Arthur G. Smith, individually and as next friend of her minor daughter, Frances Owen Smith, brought suit in the Chancery Court of the First Judicial District of Hinds County seeking an injunction to enjoin the State of Mississippi and the State Board of Education from enforcing Sections 6798 and 6799. The trial court sustained a general demurrer to amended bill of complaint and entered a decree dismissing the bill of complaint. Hence this appeal. The bill of complaint as amended alleged that Frances Own Smith, is now and has been enrolled in the public schools of this state and because of the enactment by the legislature of Sections 6798 and 6799,[1] the meaning of which is to absolutely prohibit the teaching of any theory or doctrine of descent or ascent of man from a lower order of animals that she and other children in the public school systems of this state are being deprived of the full, proper and scientific education because numerous teachers, who have been charged with scientific education of the minor have refused and failed to teach the portions of scientific curricula devoted to the theory that man and other species of animals have evolved from simpler animal forms. The bill of complaint also alleged that this refusal or failure has been fostered by the prohibition and penalties of these statutes. That Frances Owen Smith seeks to obtain a higher education with particular reference to scientific studies and because of these statutes she has been and is now being deprived of the opportunity to gain a basic educational foundation from which she can receive the necessary technical, scientific training required to engage in the profession or business which depends upon scientific knowledge of anthropology and related subjects. It is also charged that she is being further damaged because of these statutes for the reason that she cannot compete with other high school students from other parts of the United States for admission to colleges and universities requiring admission examinations containing scientific questions. The bill of complaint further charged that the statutes violate the prohibition of the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States prohibiting laws with respect to the establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. It is alleged that the purpose and intent of these statutes is to establish a religious doctrine in the school systems of the State of Mississippi by prohibiting the teaching as a theory or fact any scientific hypothesis believed to be contrary to the literal interpretation of the Book of Genesis and the Judeo-Christian religious doctrine. In support of this allegation there is attached as exhibits to the amended bill of complaint numerous newspaper reports as to what transpired in the legislature at the time the legislature was considering the passage of these laws. The amended bill of complaint also charges by virtue of these statutes that the minor complainant has been, is now, and will continue to be deprived of her constitutional right to learn the prohibited scientific theories and that she has been and is now suffering irreparable damage and that she has no adequate remedy at law. The prayer of the bill of complaint is that the court adjudicate the statute unconstitutional and that the defendants be permanently enjoined from enforcing the statutes. The State of Mississippi and the State Board of Education interposed separate demurrers to the bill of complaint. The chancellor sustained the demurrers on two grounds (1) that the bill of complaint did not state a cause of action because it did not charge that the defendants were making any effort to, or threatening, to enforce these laws; (2) that the laws were not unconstitutional as interpreted by the chancellor. In deciding whether the amended bill of complaint in this case states a cause of action, it must be kept in mind that the demurrer admits as true all facts well pleaded in the bill of complaint. When we examine the bill of complaint in this light we are of the opinion that it does state a cause of action against the State Board of Education. Courts of equity concern themselves with civil rights as well as property rights. The general principles upon which injunction will issue is well stated in Griffith, Mississippi Chancery Practice § 435 (2d ed. 1950), which is as follows The general principles upon which injunction will issue. — In view of the constant growth of new rights as civilization advances, the courts do not attempt to specify, by way of exact limitation, the particular cases wherein, and wherein only, the injunction will issue. The general principle, however, is stated as follows Courts of equity concern themselves only with matters of property and with the maintenance of civil rights, and do not interfere with issues that are purely personal, or political, or with crimes; but with these aside, then within the whole range of rights and duties, so far as the same are of civil or property rights, wherever a right exists or is created, whether by the ownership of property, or by contract, or however it may arise or exist, if it be one cognizable by law, a definitely threatened or continuing violation of that right will be prohibited by injunction, and in cases of extreme necessity will be protected by a restorative or mandatory injunction Provided, that there is no full, adequate, and complete remedy at law, and relief by injunction is practicable and can be practicably and efficiently enforced. While we do not have a declaratory judgment act, we have held in several cases that an injunction is a proper remedy to declare void city ordinances and it likewise, is a proper remedy to declare void a state statute. In Fitzhugh v. City of Jackson, 132 Miss. 585, 97 So. 190 (1923), this Court said A demurrer was interposed by the city and sustained by the chancellor. The appellants declined to amend, the bill was dismissed, and this appeal here prosecuted by complainant. It is first insisted by the appellee that appellant s remedy was by mandamus and not by bill in chancery. The bill in this case seeks to have declared void this city ordinance because it is not within the police power of the city to enact it; that this void ordinance interferes with the lawful proper use of his lot and proposed building. While there are some authorities to the contrary, the great weight of authority and the better reasoned cases hold that, where a municipal ordinance is void and its provisions are about to be enforced, or are being enforced, any person who is injuriously affected thereby either in his person or the use of his property may go into a court of equity to have the enforcement of the ordinance stayed by injunction. New Orleans Baseball Amusement Co. v. City of New Orleans, 118 La. 228, 42 South 784, 7 L.R.A. (N.S.), 1014, 118 Am.St. Rep. 366. (Emphasis added) (132 Miss. at 603, 97 So. at 191). In Brooks v. City of Jackson, 211 Miss. 246, 51 So.2d 274 (1951), we said In view of the conclusions which we have reached, we address this opinion only to the question raised as to the validity of the ordinance, since, if the ordinance is void and its provisions are about to be or are being enforced, and appellants are injuriously affected thereby, either in person or in the use of their property, they are entitled in a court of equity to have the enforcement of the ordinance enjoined. Fitzhugh v. City of Jackson, 132 Miss. 585, 97 So. 190, 33 A.L.R. 279. (211 Miss. at 252, 51 So.2d at 276). In the Town of McCool v. Blaine, 194 Miss. 221, 11 So.2d 801 (1943), we quoted the following statement from Mugler v. Kansas, 123 U.S. 623, 8 S.Ct. 273, 31 L.Ed. 205 (1887) "If * * * a statute purporting to have been enacted to protect the public health, the public morals, or the public safety, has no real or substantial relation to those objects, or is a palpable invasion of rights secured by the fundamental law, it is the duty of the courts to so adjudge, and thereby give effect to the constitution." (194 Miss. at 225, 11 So 2d at 802) (Emphasis added). While these cases involve property rights, civil rights or personal rights are no less valuable and courts of equity will lend their aid to protect those rights when they are being or about to be denied. Here appellant has alleged that she has been, and continues to be denied the right to learn by reason of these statutes. We are of the opinion and so hold that the bill of complaint in this case states a cause of action for injunctive relief against the State Board of Education. The second question to be decided is whether the statutes in question are in violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States made applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. In determining this question we are constrained to follow the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States wherein that Court has construed similar statutes involving the First Amendment to the Constituton of the United States. In the recent case of Epperson v. Arkansas, 393 U.S. 97, 89 S.Ct. 266, 21 L.Ed.2d 228 (1968), the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Arkansas statutes forbidding the teaching of evolution in public schools and colleges and universities supported in whole or part by public funds were contrary to the freedom of religion mandate of the First Amendment and in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. In this case Susan Epperson, a teacher of tenth grade biology at Central High School brought suit in a chancery court of the state seeking a declaration that the Arkansas statute was void and to enjoin the school system from dismissing her for violation of the provisions of the statute. The chancery court held that the challenged statutes were unconstitutional for the reason that they violated the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States which encompassed the prohibition upon state interference upon freedom of speech and thought which are contained in the First Amendment. The Supreme Court of Arkansas in a per curiam decision held that the challenged statute was a valid exercise in the state s power to specify the curriculum in its public schools. The court declined to express an opinion on whether the statute prohibited any explanation of the theory of evolution or merely prohibited the teaching thereof as being true. Upon appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States, that court in the majority opinion pointed out that only Arkansas and Mississippi had such anti-evolution statutes on their books, since Tennessee and Oklahoma had repealed their anti-evolution laws. Appellant argued that the challenged statute was vague and uncertain and therefore in condemnation of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The state of Arkansas argued that the statute was not vague for the reason it prohibited the teaching of evolution either as a theory or fact. The court held that it did not matter whether the statute prohibited the teaching of evolution as a fact or as a theory and in this regard said In any event, we do not rest our decision upon the asserted vagueness of the statute. On either interpretation of its language, Arkansas statute cannot stand. It is of no moment whether the law is deemed to prohibit mention of Darwin s theory, or to forbid any or all of the infinite varieties of communication embraced within the term "teaching." Under either interpretation, the law must be stricken because of its conflict with the constitutional prohibition of state laws respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. The overriding fact is that Arkansas law selects from the body of knowledge a particular segment which it proscribes for the sole reason that it is deemed to conflict with a particular religious doctrine; that is, with a particular interpretation of the Book of Genesis by a particular religious group. (393 U.S. at 103, 89 S.Ct. at 269, 270, 21 L.Ed.2d at 233, 234). The Court after citing and discussing several antecedent cases in support of its conclusion said While study of religions and of the Bible from a literary and historic viewpoint, presented objectively as part of a secular program of education, need not collide with the First Amendment s prohibition, the State may not adopt programs or practices in its public schools or colleges which "aid or oppose" any religion. Id., at 225, 83 S.Ct., at 1573. This prohibition is absolute. It forbids alike the preference of a religious doctrine or the prohibition of theory which is deemed antagonistic to a particular dogma. As Mr. Justice Clark stated in Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson, "the state has no legitimate interest in protecting any or all religions from views distasteful to them * * *." 343 U.S. 495, 505, 72 S.Ct. 777, 782, 96 L.Ed. 1098 (1952). The test was stated as follows in Abington School District v. Schempp, supra, 374 U.S. at 222, 83 S.Ct. at 1571 "[W]hat are the purpose and the primary effect of the enactment? If either is the advancement or inhibition of religion then the enactment exceeds the scope of legislative power as circumscribed by the Constitution." These precedents inevitably determine the result in the present case. The State s undoubted right to prescribe the curriculum for its public schools does not carry with it the right to prohibit, on pain of criminal penalty, the teaching of a scientific theory or doctrine where that prohibition is based upon reasons that violate the First Amendment. It is much too late to argue that the State may impose upon the teachers in its schools any conditions that it chooses, however, restrictive they may be of constitutional guarantees. Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 605-606, 87 S.Ct. 675, 684-685, 17 L.Ed.2d 629 [641-642] (1967). (393 U.S. at 106, 107, 89 S.Ct. at 271, 272, 21 L.Ed.2d at 236). Apparently the court had no difficulty in determining that the purpose of the Arkansas statute was to prevent its teachers from teaching the theory of evolution because it is contrary to the belief of some that the Book of Genesis must be the exclusive source of the doctrine as to the origin of man. The court said Its antecedent, Tennessee s "monkey law," candidly stated its purpose to make it unlawful "to teach any theory that denies the store of the Divine Creation of man as taught in the Bible, and to teach instead that man has descended from a lower order of animals." Perhaps the sensational publicity attendant upon the Scopes [Scopes v. State, 154 Tenn. 105, 289 S.W. 363] trial induced Arkansas to adopt less explicit language. It eliminated Tennessee s reference to "the story of the Divine Creation of man" as taught in the Bible, but there is no doubt that the motivation for the law was the same to suppress the teaching of a theory which, it was thought, "denied" the divine creation of man. (393 U.S. at 109, 110, 89 S.Ct. at 273, 21 L.Ed.2d at 236, 237). There can be little doubt, if any, that the court would make the same finding relative to our statute. In spite of what the Supreme Court said in Epperson, supra, appellees argue that we should uphold the challenged statutes because of the difference in the language in our statute and the Arkansas statute. The only difference insofar as the teaching of evolution is concerned, is that our statute makes the violation to teach that mankind ascended or descended from a lower form of animal. While the Arkansas law made it a violation to teach "the theory or doctrine that mankind ascended or descended from a lower form of animals. We are unable to see any material difference in the meaning of the two statutes. We are also unable to agree with the learned chancellor that our statute makes it a violation to teach evolution as a fact, and that our statute can be construed to mean that it is permissible to teach it as a theory. However, it is immaterial under the holding of the Supreme Court of the United States whether it can be so construed. Finally appellees argue that our statute should be upheld because our state laws are such as to make us neutral between religion and religion and between religion and non-religion as required by the First Amendment. It is contended that Section 6216-11, Mississippi Code 1942 Annotated (Supp. 1968), which states Doctrinal sectarian or denominational teaching forbidden. — No doctrinal, sectarian or denominated teaching shall be permitted in public schools of this state. It shall be the duty of the county superintendents of education and the superintendents of municipal separate school districts to enforce the provisions of this section. in effect prohibits the indoctrination of the students that mankind was spontaneously created by God. Appellees say, "Thus, we have complete neutrality. The students may not be indoctrinated either with the idea that mankind evolved from a lower species of animal, nor may they be indoctrinated by the idea that man was created by the spontaneous act of God." It is difficult to believe that appellees are serious in this contention. Whatever Section 6216-11 does mean, it certainly does not mean that the teaching that mankind was spontaneously created by God is prohibited by this statute. We do not have, and should not have, any statute which would prohibit the teaching of the Bible in our public schools. In fact, our Constitution prohibits the enactment of a law prohibiting the use of the Bible in the public schools of this State. Article 3, Section 18, Mississippi Constitution (1890). The use of the Bible in our schools must, of course, be a proper use. The decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States which interpret the Constitution of the United States are binding upon us and we have no choice other than to follow such decisions. It is clear to us from what was said in Epperson, supra, that the Supreme Court of the United States has for all practical purposes already held that our anti-evolution statutes are unconstitutional. Therefore, we are constrained to hold that Sections 6798 and 6799 are unconstitutional, thus void and of no effect. We hold that the chancellor was in error in sustaining the demurrer of the State Board of Education to the amended bill of complaint. However, we are of the opinion that the demurrer of the State of Mississippi was well taken for the reason that the sovereignty is not subject to suit in this case without its consent and the bill of complaint fails to allege that it has so consented. We also hold that Section 6798 and 6799 are in contravention to the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and are, therefore, void and of no effect. For the reasons stated, this case is reversed and remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. Reversed and remanded. All Justices concur. [1] § 6798. Schools supported by state not to teach that man ascended or descended from the lower order of animals. — It shall be unlawful for any teacher or other instructor in any university, college, normal, public school or other institution of the state which is supported in whole or in part from public funds derived by state or local taxation to teach that mankind ascended or descended from a lower order of animals and also it shall be unlawful for any teacher, textbook commission or other authority exercising the power to select textbooks for above mentioned educational institutions to adopt or use in any such institution a textbook that teaches the doctrine that mankind ascended or descended from the lower order of animals. § 6799. Penalty for violation of law. — Any teacher or other instructor or textbook commissioner who is found guilty of violation of the foregoing section by teaching, using, adopting any such textbooks in any such educational institution shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction be fined not exceeding $500.00; and upon conviction shall vacate the position thus held in any educational institution of the character above mentioned or any commission of which he may then be a member.
https://w.atwiki.jp/dofus/pages/81.html
初心者の館 目次 ダウンロードについて アカウント作成 課金と制限 コマンド profession(生産) 戦闘とショートカット ようこそdofus(オリジナル版)へ 英語がにがてな方でも大丈夫、世界各国さまざまな人が遊んでいますが 英語が苦手だという方はたくさんいます。 日本版が来るという事で本国版とどの程度の違いがあるかまだ分かりませんので 一応、日本板でも対応できるような基本的な部分だけ触れたいと思います。 dofus ダウンロードについて 公式サイトからダウンロードページへ進み、linux/mac or windowsを選び ファイルをDLしてください。 mac/linuxの場合ですが、ファイルをDLしたあと、playerもしくはブラウザ等で機動した時に 設定をしてくれというメッセージがでると思います。 出ない場合は特に問題ないのでそのまま遊んでください。 flash playerの設定>高度な設定>グローバルセキュリティー>DOFUSフォルダを常に信頼に追加してください。 また、それでもエラー出る場合はサイトURLも追加するといいかも。 日本版:どのようなログイン方式をとるか分かりませんが フラッシュに関しての設定は同じですので、入れない事があったら フラッシュ設定の方を操作してみてください。 アカウント作成について 英語版:公式サイトへいきplayをクリック、create your accountをクリックし 情報入力してください。アカウントは基本的にいくつも作れるようで 複数アカを使って2キャラ等の操作もできるようですが自己責任でお願いします。 日本版:情報待ち。オープンβ予約受付中。アエリアのIDを拾得しておこう 課金と制限について。 英語版 無料地域:制限がかかっています、ペットは持つ事は出来ますが 装備することはできません(ターキーも同じく) 生産はlvl30の制限がありlvl100だったとしても無料プレイヤーになった時点で 30に強制的に戻されます。課金をするともとのlvlに戻るのでご安心を。 astrubという地域のみ戦闘の観戦、戦闘への参加、トレードが出来ます。 お店を出すことができません。 課金地域にいた場合、ログインしたとき無課金地域に強制送還されます。 課金地域でのフレンドファイトは出来ますが、終了後に強制送還されます。 課金地域へzaapをつかって移動できますが、課金地域からのzaap使用ができません。 課金地域:制限がありません。 課金でないと拾得できない生産もあります、アイテム強化等。 月額タイプになっています。 一か月、三ヶ月、六か月、一年と月を指定して買います。 自動更新でわないので、課金日数の残数に注意 重複課金可能、残り日数+新しく課金した日数となります (一週間という短い課金もあるようです、お試し?) 課金をするとペットやアイテムが貰えるサービスがついてます。 課金月数で性能等が違います。 課金方式:クレジットカード、ペイパル、銀行振り込み等複数有。 銀行振込みはpay by chashを選び、正確な住所と電話番号を入れたあと 銀行振込みというカテゴリーを選んでください。 e-bankだとより早く処理が行われます。 また、e-bankがなくてもe-bankを経由することで処理が早いようです。 日本版:課金方式、課金による制限等すべてに置いて不明、情報待ち。 コマンド /sitもしくはチャット左上の+ 口のマーク(エモーション一覧) トリの足跡見たいなマーク(コレ)を押すと座ります。 これでhpが回復しますので、回復アイテム等もってないときは座りましょう。 /w 相手の名前 例:/w hanako ohayo- ウィスパーを送ります。 page up(keybordの)送った相手もしくは送ってきた相手の名前を簡単replay keybordの↑↓で自分が書いたコメントをreplay。 送ったウィスパー等の自分コメントログ確認もこれで。 ghostになってしまった時、mapをみると赤い旗がたってるハズ。 それを目指してください。一番近いところへ。 キョロちゃんみたいなのがいる場所に行けますのでそれをタッチして戻ってください。 profession(生産)について。 向課金はlvl30まで、lvl30に達すれば次のprofも受けられるが mageはlvl65から習得なので課金限定になる。 アルケミストsell roomにてprofession forget potionが売ってるので それでjobを消すこともできる。 日本版:序盤は出回らないだろうから生産選びは慎重に 戦闘とショートカット optionからキーボードやグラフィック、効果の細かい設定が可能です。 ターンスキップやスキルのショートカットの割り振りをし使いやすくしましょう。 キーボード操作だけでスキルやターンスキップが出来ると 戦闘時のマウスは移動と選択ぐらいになり、テンポ良くできます。 戦闘はフィールドにいるモブをクリックするかモブから襲ってくるかで 戦闘準備状態になります。 この準備状態は戦闘時のスタートポジションを選ぶ時間と 他の人が参戦できる時間と同時に進行しています。 ポジション選んでたら人が入ってきた!という事も結構あります 戦闘準備状態の時はフィールドに剣のマークが刺さり それをクリックする事で他プレイヤーは参戦することができます。 モブをクリックした人orモブに襲われた人に権利があり ロックや追放が可能となっています。 ソロで戦闘したい場合はロックをしてから追放するのが良いでしょう。 またドロップ狙いの場合は敢えて乱戦状態にするのも一つの手です。 参加人数が増えればレアドロップが見込め、全滅も回避できるからです。 長くなりましたが、楽しいドフスライフを!